Opinion: The real Lance Armstrong

Lance Armstrong deserves to be forgotten, says The Daily Shift’s David Prendergast… 

Lance Armstrong during the Oprah Winfrey interview

Lance Armstrong during the Oprah Winfrey interview

Lance Armstrong is the ultimate scumbag. But he isn’t a scumbag because he took drugs.

He is a scumbag because of the intimidation, the bribes, the bullying and the legal threats he used to demonise those who dared to tell the truth against him.

He is a scumbag because he used the fact that he had fought cancer and won as a PR weapon to absolve him from any questions or curiosity about whether or not he was using performance enhancing drugs.

He is a scumbag because he used his battle with cancer to market his face as a universal icon.

Lance Armstrong’s expected confession to Oprah Winfrey is not about contrition. Make no mistake he will be using this stage to further his own interests, just as he used his lies to further his own interests.

Lance Armstrong didn’t just win seven Tour de France titles by using performance enhancing drugs. With his fraudulent titles he built a brand and organisation that made him rich.

He used his foundation, Livestrong, as leverage to attract sponsors, endorsements and investments. Companies such as Honey Stinger food bars and FRS sports drinks endorsed Livestrong, paid Armstrong to be a spokesman and in return got access to sell their products at Livestrong events.

Livestrong spent aggressively on PR, marketing and branding to propel Armstrong’s image into what his lawyers described him as when people questioned his authenticity: “A national hero best known for his role in the fight against cancer.”

Most people make the mistake of assuming that Livestrong raise money for cancer research. But it doesn’t. Some have even suggested that Armstrong’s crimes are forgivable because he has raised “hundreds of millions of dollars for cancer research.” He hasn’t.

Livestrong raised $20 million for cancer research between 1997 and 2005. Then it stopped. Now it publishes cancer guide books detailing the many treatment options patients can choose from to fight the disease.

Since 2005 Livestrong has spent more money on PR, marketing, branding, merchandise, construction and legal bills than it ever did on cancer research.

Then there is www.livestrong.com which was developed in 2008. It is a commercial health and fitness website developed for profit. It trades under the same logos as the non-profit www.livestrong.org  but none of the money it receives for sale of its merchandises is used to help cancer survivors. When the company went public Armstrong’s sold his 156,000 shares and made $2 million.

A thousand pages of evidence compiled by Usada that include sworn affidavits, medical records, test results and email correspondence already told us that Lance Armstrong is a drug cheat. Not only that, the report told us it was “the most sophisticated, professionalised and successful doping programme that sport has ever seen”.

An example of such evidence include this anecdote that in 1999 Armstrong’s samples that tested positive for EPO contained no naturally produced EPO. It was all artificial; implying that he had been aggressively doping for so long that his body had stopped producing its own EPO.

We don’t need to hear his bullshit confession now.

We need to hear an apology for the innocent people’s lives he ruined. People like Betsy Andreu and Emma O’Reilly.

Betsy Andreu, the wife of Armstrong’s former teammate Frankie Andreu, was one of the first people to claim Armstrong was doping. She said she was present in an Indiana University hospital room on October 27, 1996 when Armstrong told doctors treating him for cancer that he had doped with EPO, human growth hormones, cortisone, steroids and testosterone.

Armstrong responded by labelling her “vindictive, bitter, vengeful and jealous.”

Emma O’Reilly, his former masseuse, tried to tell the truth in 2003. She spoke of how Armstrong had her ferry drugs and syringes around France for him in 1999. He sued her for libel and demonised her to the media as a “whore” with a drinking problem.

With such a sociopathic styled defence of himself no wonder so many believed him for so long.

The list goes on. Tyler Hamilton, Michele Ferrari, Filippo Simeoni, Greg LeMond, Frankie Andreu, Christophe Bassons, David Walsh and Paul Kimmage are just some of the names Armstrong either threatened, bribed or sued in his relentless campaign to discredit those who dared speak out against him.

Don’t expect Oprah Winfrey’s interview to reveal any redeeming qualities about the man. In fact, don’t even bother watching it.

He doesn’t deserve anymore of our attention.

*Lead image via gossipcop.com
About these ads

2 comments on “Opinion: The real Lance Armstrong

  1. People pointing fingers usually have something to hide themselves. Trying to get rid of their guilt by slagging someone else. Most cyclists take some orm of enhancing performance drugs.Armstrong was just unlucky to get found out. I don’t condone it but I saw a lot of jealousy BEFOREanyone knew he was taking the stuff. People who do not do well are always jealous of someone doing well.Its a known fact. All I see in the above article is bitterness. Probably caused by the writer’s own ego.

  2. I can’t get excited about someone who rides bikes for a living BUT I have had cancer.

    Is it possible that his lifestyle gave him the cancer? Razor thin bike saddles? Performance enhancing drugs?

    Just a thought.

Drop us a comment for the craic!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,743 other followers

%d bloggers like this: